Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technosexual (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Should someone wish to create a redirect to wiktionary, it can be done editorially. Star Mississippi 16:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technosexual

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still appears to be a WP:NOTDICTIONARY violation. The only non-definition content is trivial mentions. Dronebogus (talk) 10:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Soft redirect to Wiktionary. Ovinus (talk) 02:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 18:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary redirect as suggested by Ovinus InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 20:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a Wiktionary material. I don't mind redirect, though, too. --Suitskvarts (talk) 13:12, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.