Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Itch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Technical Itch

Contested prod. Article is about a non-notable band/musician. No reliable sources provided, none found outside of various social networking sites and self-promotional material. I could not find evidence of a charted hit. TN‑X-Man 15:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Non-notable musician, a quick Google-search did not return any result with real content. JdeJ (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC. Tatarian (talk) 13:28, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep None of the reasons for deletion stated above are true. Any minimal amount of searching would (and does) produce easy to find results of the notable contribution of this artist to the electronic music scene, particularly Drum n Bass. Examples include availability of works from Beatport.com, iTunes, references andguest spots on Drum n Bass Arena, discogs.com, Pitchfork http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/feature/38672/The_Month_In_The_Month_In_Grime_Dubstep, eMusic, for example). TI is one of the most prolific artists and producers in the genre today. Also, the 'Fails WP:MUSIC' above does not stand up from the very first criteria: "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable."

Delete: notability not established, as per WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are trivial coverage, or only verify existance, not notability.Yobmod (talk) 10:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.