Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechNews.LK
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 01:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- TechNews.LK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:WEB. No notable sources, most of the listed sources are WP:UGC. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 09:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 09:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 09:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 09:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 09:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. when you need to include Facebook, youtube and twitter in only 7 sources you present than the subject is not notable. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 10:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. it should also be pointed out that the 'awards' they won are just blackhat seo sites Sulfurboy (talk) 10:48, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, Non notable website, non notable awards, appalling sources. Theroadislong (talk) 11:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and others - there is nothing notable here and it looks suspiciously like COI/paid work. creffett (talk) 13:58, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom and others. Nothing to show topic is worthy of an entry. Eagleash (talk) 15:53, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:WEB and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.