Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tall Trees
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Tall Trees (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be a notable business based upon the article. Herp Derp (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Whilst the nightclub is Newquay might not be notable, the venue near Yarm probably is. The Tall Trees near Yarm is a large venue which is well-known across the local area. I don't have time to do a detailed search for coverage of both venues right now, but that's a complication to consider in this debate. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or convert Yes, the article is about the small one but it mentions the big one with the same name. No indication of notability for the small one. I suppose what should really happen is to convert the article to being about the big one. North8000 (talk) 19:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 21:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.