Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tai Urban

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tai Urban

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a 12 year old who doesn't appear to be notable as a martial artist or actor (see WP:MANOTE and WP:NACTOR). The article focuses on his martial arts, but winning some 10 and 11 year old divisions at a minor tournament (NASKA rated 3A on a scale of 1A to 6A) and a junior underbelt board breaking competition does not show notability. There also seems to be a lack of good independent sources. The article lists 4 sources--IMDB, a site similar to IMDB, a broken link, and a link to the aforementioned tournament resuls. None of those show significant coverage by an independent and reliable source. Papaursa (talk) 21:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 21:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Vacation^nine 22:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Isn't notable as an actor or martial artist and the article lacks good sources. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 18:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. If he continues with his acting career, or martial arts career, he may become notable in the future so no prejudice to recreation when that happens. -- Whpq (talk) 16:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.Peter Rehse (talk) 13:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.