Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tafsir Ishraq Al-Ma'ani
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tafsir Ishraq Al-Ma'ani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I searched the internet for WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK, but it didn’t work.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 14:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and India. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 14:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Redirect to Syed_Iqbal_Zaheer#Tafsir_Ishraq_al-Ma`ani orDelete. Fails to meet WP:NBOOK. RangersRus (talk) 15:10, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- @RangersRus: The notability of Syed Iqbal Zaheer is also questionable.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 14:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. Striked redirect. RangersRus (talk) 13:13, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- @RangersRus: The notability of Syed Iqbal Zaheer is also questionable.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 14:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.