Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tabor Rotation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:35, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tabor Rotation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would expect that a teaching technique would have traces in academic literature, but the only paper I found was published in the journal of a state math teachers association. All citations are to Tabor's website. Possibly the link to Regent University scared people off, but at any rate I see no serious interest in this. Mangoe (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, found these - PR about TR, download site with more PRs, a mention in Science for Primary and Early Years , Developing Subject Knowledge, NCTM TR conference session, and a teacher's blog extolling TR but i do not believe these amount to notability ie. is it an official part of the curriculum?, hopefully some wikieducationeditors can assist. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Blog posts, press releases and content-free mentions in the swamp of Wikipedia mirrors floating around Google Books aren't reliable sources. Nor is an abstract for a conference session led by Tabor herself. There just isn't anything out there worth writing about. XOR'easter (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 21:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.