Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TSR-2MS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TSR-2MS

Non-notable fictional ship, deprodded. Abductive (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (subject to change) as non notable unless adequate sourcing can be found. While the occasional vehicle can be notable, they are the exception rather then the rule. The series the vehicle is from isn't that well known in comparison to other shows, so while there may be reliable sources to prove notability, I don't think it's unreasonable to assume they are going to be very hard to find. I did a quick google search purely to see if there were any potential leads on the "mainstream" sites. The best I could find was an unreliable section of Anime News Network claiming that its based on a real life aircraft [1]. While the source itself isn't useable (while ANN's news, reviews and columns are reliable, it's encyclopedia is not as its user edited), it may provide a lead to find a verifiable, reliable source. If such a source can be provided, I may consider changing to keep, but this will depend on the source and any attempts to improve the article. Dandy Sephy (talk) 23:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with Dandy Sephy on this one, who has laid out the arguments well. Redirect to Stratos 4 (as possible obscure search term) until and unless sources proving its notability are found. —Quasirandom (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Dandy Sephy and laugh at lame addition of the {{rescue}} tag to the article. Since we don't have a notability guideline for fictional objects, we have to fall back onto the general notability guideline. And although Mania.com extensively reviewed the series, they made no mention of this fictional aircraft. --Farix (Talk) 00:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & Redirect Fictional vehicle or Fictional character = same fight. It required RS Third party coverage. Unless proved otherwise there is none specific to this vehicle in available reviews. --KrebMarkt 06:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't appear to be notable, this information might be useful in its parent article, if it can be sourced. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 07:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.