Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TPC River's Bend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. asilvering (talk) 07:34, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TPC River's Bend

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Golf club that fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. No in-depth sources found, only brief mentions. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Golf and Ohio. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: there is a perfectly good WP:ATD here, with a redirect to Tournament Players Club. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 11:50, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - How were these missed in the WP:BEFORE search? Was Google News even searched? I found these here - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. 6, 7, 8 KatoKungLee (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on suggested sourcing would be useful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 00:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect to Tournament Players Club. We should avoid WP:LOTSOFSOURCES argument; as nom didn't say there were none, they noted a lack of in-depth coverage. Also, 4 of 8 links provided by KatoKungLee are only findable w/ a newspapers.com subscription.
There's a lot of routine/mention coverage to wade through but [7] (fairly in-depth review in RS), [8] (article not specifically about course but provides some good detail about it), [5] (also decent detail, discusses golf digest awards) are the three best sources imo. I oppose outright deletion, but don't feel very strongly about keep vs. redirect. Zzz plant (talk) 01:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per KatoKungLee. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 16:38, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.