Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNTmips (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The only delete vote post additional sources being added gave no meaningful rationale and did not address why the new sources were insufficient. SpinningSpark 16:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TNTmips

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article that has existed since 2005 about non-notable software that has failed in that time to provide any references showing how this topic meets the criteria for notability. -- Longhair\^talk 08:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE non-notable software product from non-notable company, and an article that It isn't even clear from this infrequently edited article whether the product is still current. Just 3 edits in 8 years since 2013 surely means this is a product and page that nobody cares about / nobody will miss. --10mmsocket (talk) 14:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I cannot find any evidence of sources that might get to meeting WP:GNG. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Although the article Infobox is showing a 2013 version, the software does appear to be actively maintained, currently under TNTgis 2021. A Google Books preview from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Practices by Ruiliang Pu shows the first page of what appears to be a thorough product feature assessment which could contribute here. AllyD (talk) 07:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: (Pu,2017), & (Choudury, Chackrabati & Choudury, 2013) sources added to article; seems to overcome the nom. & delete !votes. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I found [this book], which discusses the software's functionality throughout. It appears to still be a relevant tool for GIS work and passes WP:GNG with the found book source and the sources already cited on the page. Heartmusic678 (talk) 16:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable. Gentleman wiki (talk) 16:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as sources have been found since the nomination that appear to establish notability. NemesisAT (talk) 22:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV with sources added to the article and provided in the discussion above by Heartmusic678, Djm-leighpark, and AllyD.4meter4 (talk) 21:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.