Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TERCILE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Quantile. and move to Tercile Jujutacular ^talk 05:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TERCILE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Wikipedia is not a dictionary - WP:NOTDIC (and it's not even the right definition anyway) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:06, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 15:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or delete. Would a redirect to Quantile be a good solution? That's the only article here that mentions the word (and internally it links to wikt:tercile). -- Quiddity (talk) 19:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Boing! said Zebedee's rationale and Quiddity's outcome. Rename it to tercile (without a redirect) per our naming conventions and redirect the resultant page to quantile. Uncle G (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm with Uncle on this one. --Orange Mike | Talk 09:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.