Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. P. Senkumar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Rlendog (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- T. P. Senkumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks notability AshLey Msg 11:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—fails WP:GNG. Imzadi 1979 → 07:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Senior police officer and senior civil servant. Appears to meet notability standards. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:18, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral. The article has references, but I'm unsure as to whether they substantiate why the article's subject is notable. It's a shame none of the "Delete" voters said specifically why it failed the GNG. --Ritchie333 (talk) 08:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.