Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sync.com (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sync.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NORG notably WP:ORGDEPTH The sources are 1: company website, 2: passing mention, 3: business directory, 4: a review of product, 5: an article about the company when it was a startup that says "Here’s a startup that can be successful, and if all claims it’s making are indeed true, Dropbox and Google should take note." 6: routine coverage, 7: PR article with quotes from company personnel, 8: company blog, 9: company website Dom from Paris (talk) 02:12, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 02:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 02:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 02:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The best of the provided sources are probably the TechvibesNewsdesk and CloudStorageBoss review of product features. Elsewhere the product is mentioned in comparative discussions (e.g. [1]), including recommendations in a Cloudwards comparative review. Considered as a company, I don't see the coverage needed for WP:CORPDEPTH; considered as a product, it may be a closer call given these product reviews, but still too slight in WP:RS coverage for WP:NSOFT. AllyD (talk) 08:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails CORPDEPTH. Not good enough for SOFT per AllyD. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I'm working on this article, including hopefully adding better sources — AllenAdam76 07:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.