Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syler
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 01:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Syler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable musician. Koala15 (talk) 04:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 24. Snotbot t • c » 05:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 06:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Referencing in the article is poor. The best is the Newsday item which is really a local piece. This unsigned artist has not received the significant coverage in multiple indepedent reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Referencing is poor and searches yield people with the last name Syler, but not this Syler. Article serves as promotional vehicle for Scott Seiler. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:08, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.