Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweans Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sweans Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with the basis that the extra sources are enough, but examining them simply found PR-speak contents, nothing of actual substance and ym own searches have found nothing better, as mentioned by my PROD. SwisterTwister talk 17:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Company lacks notability and no third party reliable sources are provided, other than brief mentions about the company.Tinton5 (talk) 21:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 03:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable sources cited (directory listings and press releases). Unable to establish notability through other searches. ~Kvng (talk) 17:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.