Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swaf markup language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Swaf markup language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One-man project; no sources cited, and none that I could find in quick web search, to establish WP:NSOFT. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating the duplicate (now redirect) Swaf. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring AfD tag and tentative delete for no good sources (of the markup language) found. I do see other potentially notable uses of "swaf" as acronyms or names. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 15:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could not find any reliable sources for this. Not notable enough to include as its own page. Tinton5 (talk) 21:02, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating the duplicate SWAF markup language — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.