Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SupJustin.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SupJustin.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Blog site with no clear notability. Speedy deletion contested by article creator. Oscarthecat (talk) 10:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Already speedied twice, Alexia ranking of >570,000, percentage of global internet users who have visited the blog is 0.00031% (58% USA, 27% Swiss)So it is does not have particularly strong penetration or a global presence. It has had a few references in other media but when it comes down to it it is still a single person blog with some music gossip. The speedy debate had a whiff of COI. I feel it may eventually be noteworthy enough to have an article but I don't think notability has been established at this stage. delete without prejudice. Porturology (talk) 11:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete....again. Totally non-notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - A7 Web. Highest Heights (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. The blog doesn't seem notable enough on its own. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This blog has clear notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.200.155.229 (talk • contribs) ::— 76.200.155.229 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
save This blog always posts exclusive song streams and is always credited for doing so on AbsolutePunk.net and Alternative Press. Example of exclusive credited on AbsolutePunk.net (which is a highly respectable music news site)[1] SupJustin.com is also a VIP on Buzznet's FriendsOrEnemies.com[2] website. -Varsityhero (talk) 10:33 14 June 2009
- — Varsityhero (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete. Pretty clearly non-notable. Whether or not the content of the site is unique isn't really relevant. All blogs have "exclusive content" unless they're plagiarized. eaolson (talk) 20:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As stated in the Notability (web) requirements "the content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles", a few of SupJustin's interviews with bands have been published in the magazine Alternative Press. Varsityhero (talk) 1:57 15 June 2009 —Preceding undated comment added 08:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment. Citations? eaolson (talk) 00:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
References
[edit]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:WEB. 7 talk | Δ | 22:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - non-notable web site; article is a pure advert... --mhking (talk) 00:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.