Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunder Ramu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 16:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sunder Ramu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An actor. Only acting experience is in a movie that is currently filming and in an upcoming one. Unable to find any reliable sources about him. Only sources I can find are the same type currently in the article, mentions that he is going to be in the film. Bgwhite (talk) 19:17, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The film will release within a month, if I am not mistaken. Anyway, Behindwoods and Indiaglitz are reliable sources, though not notable. If you want further sources, check this one published by the prestigious India Today magazine. It has a section about him. But unfortunately, it will remain as stub class for sometime. Secret of success Talk to me 06:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it - Even though not a creator of the article, i felt this article needs to be in Wikipedia. His first film Mayakkam Enna is in post production stage set to be released on 26 October, has already signed for another film 3. Karthik Nadar (talk) 06:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:15, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:15, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article is sourced by a half-dozen puff pieces placed ahead of his first movie's premier. If you search, you can find a couple more in the same vein. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Assuming that his movies do eventually begin to appear and he achieves actual notability as a result, then by all means, let's have this article. But not now. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 22:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I request, let the article be stub for few days... Why to delete and again add up. Karthik Nadar (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Because there is no particular reason to believe the if this person releases ten new movies in the next few days that he will suddenly become notable. Please note that WP is not meant to serve as a marketing tool. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If Deleting, please do Email me. -- Karthik Nadar (talk) 18:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I request, let the article be stub for few days... Why to delete and again add up. Karthik Nadar (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Nothing to write about the person. Max Longint (talk) 22:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:NACTOR - has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, with no further claims of notability.--Michaela den (talk) 09:56, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of any notability. He doesn't yet have an actually acting career.Vincelord (talk) 14:19, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.