Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumerian Records (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 04:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Sumerian Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An list of mainly redlinked artists signed to a record label whose article we deleted. Guy (Help!) 23:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural keep. Nominating this article less than three weeks after an unopposed "keep" closure of the previous AfD seems unhelpful (on the merits, the article should be deleted, as I would have opined had I seen the previous nomination). Bongomatic 01:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural keep per Bongomatic. I won't close because I !voted keep last time. Bearian (talk) 00:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Of clear cultural relevance given its roster. It was kept at AfD less than a month ago, and I don't see a particular reason why that consensus would have changed so quickly. Chubbles (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Rather a waste of everybody's time so soon after the last AFD.--Michig (talk) 16:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the above; Sumerian Records discography shows many albums that have either charted or have been reviewed by independent sources. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 17:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.