Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumerian Records
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Cuneiform script. MBisanz talk 03:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sumerian Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Blatant advertisment; should be speedy deleted, but CSD G11 was declined; this article was speedied once before, I believe for CSD G11 -- Gmatsuda (talk) 22:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I cleaned up the article. The result is a reasonable stub on a small record label that did sign a few mildly notable bands. We're talking about a fairly small niche so we can't expect the label to be that well-known outside of the equally small community of fans. I really can't see any compelling result to delete. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 22:27, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was leaning toward keep until I really started digging into the acts associated with the label. Of the four of them that actually have articles written, three of them badly fail WP:BAND and should probably be up for AfD themselves. Trusilver 23:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- But if it isn't kept, then Redirect to Cuneiform script. Mandsford (talk) 03:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - 71.138.125.138 (talk) 03:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - Nothing but a blatant advertisment. -- 149.142.220.66 (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.