Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suma Soft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 09:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suma Soft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. I did a search for sources and the very best I could find was this which isn't much more than a brief mention. Borderline promotional and is basically just a company trying to write a vanity piece on itself including an unsourcable complete history of the company. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 07:33, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Easily fails WP:GNG. Ajf773 (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An unreferenced WP:SPA article on a company. (There have been multiple speedy deletions for both titles Suma Soft and SumaSoft.) My searches are finding the same as the nominator's and nothing better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Unnotable provider of "solutions". . . Mean as custard (talk) 09:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt - has already been deleted three times for lack of notability and promotion. (disclosure: I was one of the deleting admins). 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:24, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The user is repeatedly recreating it without addressing any of the issues. The person seems to be associated with the enterprise. Jupitus Smart 18:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.