Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Study.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Study.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. It gets a couple of passing mentions (with other providers) but nothing of any great merit. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't appear to be notable. Dane2007 (talk) 04:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- does not meet GNG & only trivial mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - appears to be more of an advertisement than an article. Fully non-notable. Ajf773 (talk) 22:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I honestly would have PRODed instead, nothing substantial and it is only PR. SwisterTwister talk 03:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.