Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Riordan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Stuart Riordan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find any third-party references about this person. While the article cites 12 or 13 references, there are indeed only a few unique references (3 or 4), but it is difficult to determine the actual source of the references. I could find one or two instances where Stuart's work is listed on a calendar or something, but no reviews or interviews or notable third-party coverage. — Timneu22 · talk 14:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The links in the article don't show "significant coverage". First Light (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.