Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StrongDM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

StrongDM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Moved to mainspace without the required AfC. Coverage is based on company-sponsored press-releases. Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bbarmadillo. The subject doesn't meet the WP:GNG criteria to begin with. The only reliable source per RSN cited in the article is WP:TECHCRUNCH; however, the source isn't independent of the subject since the founder is being interviewed, and cannot be asserted for notability. WikiLinuz 🍁 (talk) 18:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Even TechCrunch is yellow-rated at WP:RSP for its incessant boosterism, and isn't so usable for notability - David Gerard (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it stands - a distinct paucity of RS coverage that isn't about fundraising. And that's apart from the bit where the article is admitted paid spam - David Gerard (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Article reads like excerpts from a press release. No reliable sources here. --Whiteguru (talk) 21:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as thinly-veiled corporate PR. XOR'easter (talk) 16:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete N Article fails on WP:! policies. Louie (talk) 04:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I hate to be the only one going against Deletes, but the Inc article and Techcrunch article are pretty good. This company meets notability per guidelines, so perhaps it just needs to be improved or draftified. Chelokabob (talk) 09:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly promotional article, which is sufficient reason for deletion. If it's notable, an ed. without coi will write an article. DGG ( talk ) 03:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete references fail WP:ORGIND as they rely entirely on announcements and PR, none with "Independent Content" on the company. Topic fails WP:NCORP HighKing⁺⁺ 21:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and WikiLinuz. WikiJoeB (talk) 12:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.