Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strong2kin Moov
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. I've deleted this as CSD:A7. Besides removal of a couple of dubious claims, the article is substantially the same as the previously deleted article SpinningSpark 14:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Strong2kin Moov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was speedily deleted as promotional less than a month ago, page author was asked to make a statement regarding possible conflict of interest and has so far ignored the request per Jimfbleak. Page should not have been recreated without addressing this concern, which seems well justified.A loose necktie (talk) 09:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! I really talk with Jimfbleak and he left me remarks why the page was deleted. If you look closely in the recreation history of the page, I did mention that. Here is Jimfbleak's reply on my talk page. ℂℙ𝔾𝕃ℂ𝕆ℕ𝔾𝕆 (乚モイ 州モ に几ロ山 什モ尺モ) 09:52, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I have to say I find the COI/UPE charge pretty much appears substantiated by the pattern of editing and response to Jimfbleak. The company in the article fails WP:NCORP in any case. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- By the way, I hadn't figured out the reason yet. And even now, it's still unclear. I thought I had improved from the comments made on my talk page, but unfortunately that was not the case. It's just a page, even if I wanted it to be published. For sources, there are plenty on the internet. Thank you for your reactions. ℂℙ𝔾𝕃ℂ𝕆ℕ𝔾𝕆 (乚モイ 州モ に几ロ山 什モ尺モ) 20:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete "This is what we do" promo with no facts to suggest notability Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Websites, and Democratic Republic of the Congo. Shellwood (talk) 10:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete more utterly non-notable, unsupported spam by the creator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 11:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Regarding spam, I don't know if it's wrong to contribute to multiple Wikipedia projects? I speak four languages perfectly and can contribute at a basic level in a few other languages. On Wikipedia, I only contribute in three languages mainly. I don't know if it's forbidden to make contributions in more than one language?ℂℙ𝔾𝕃ℂ𝕆ℕ𝔾𝕆 (乚モイ 州モ に几ロ山 什モ尺モ) 20:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- No one said anything about use of multiple languages, it's your persistent cross-wiki promotion of non-notable subjects that's the issue here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:30, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. It's because a lot of my content (especially in Swahili) is deleted with the pretext that it's cross-spamming. Even content created several months ago is deleted. I had the impression that it is a bit forbidden to write in more than one language. Thanks for the precision. So, I never write content on Wikipedia without a source (because I know it's recommended and important) and never did it for a promotion. I'm just contributing. ℂℙ𝔾𝕃ℂ𝕆ℕ𝔾𝕆 (乚モイ 州モ に几ロ山 什モ尺モ) 21:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- It might be best if you continued to make contributions only to those wikipedias in which you are truly fluent. Clearly you are competent at English, but this is not the same thing as fluency. Your work here is likely to end up being deleted because you do not understand the details of our policies. Please consider the request. Thank you. A loose necktie (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you guys.ℂℙ𝔾𝕃ℂ𝕆ℕ𝔾𝕆 (乚モイ 州モ に几ロ山 什モ尺モ) 14:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- It might be best if you continued to make contributions only to those wikipedias in which you are truly fluent. Clearly you are competent at English, but this is not the same thing as fluency. Your work here is likely to end up being deleted because you do not understand the details of our policies. Please consider the request. Thank you. A loose necktie (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. It's because a lot of my content (especially in Swahili) is deleted with the pretext that it's cross-spamming. Even content created several months ago is deleted. I had the impression that it is a bit forbidden to write in more than one language. Thanks for the precision. So, I never write content on Wikipedia without a source (because I know it's recommended and important) and never did it for a promotion. I'm just contributing. ℂℙ𝔾𝕃ℂ𝕆ℕ𝔾𝕆 (乚モイ 州モ に几ロ山 什モ尺モ) 21:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- No one said anything about use of multiple languages, it's your persistent cross-wiki promotion of non-notable subjects that's the issue here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:30, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Regarding spam, I don't know if it's wrong to contribute to multiple Wikipedia projects? I speak four languages perfectly and can contribute at a basic level in a few other languages. On Wikipedia, I only contribute in three languages mainly. I don't know if it's forbidden to make contributions in more than one language?ℂℙ𝔾𝕃ℂ𝕆ℕ𝔾𝕆 (乚モイ 州モ に几ロ山 什モ尺モ) 20:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.