Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strange Frame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was incubate. Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Strange Frame Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strange Frame

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreleased, arguably non-notable film. Although it's apparently in post-production, it doesn't have a release date or any distribution schedule, and doesn't seem likely to get finished any time soon. Meanwhile, it only seems to have received relatively brief, trivial coverage from reliable sources: [1], [2], [3]. While it does involve various notable people, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from them. In short, while this film may become notable in the future (if it is ever finished and released), it's too early to have an article on it at the moment. Robofish (talk) 17:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incubate for a short while. We can wait until the film is released and gets coverage, but there is not enough yet available to meet WP:NF. If it is never released, the article can be deleted from the incubator. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 06:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.