Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Rich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 07:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stephan Rich

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. His name is only mentioned in passing in the cited source, that's in the appendix (which is just a list of hundreds of different people mentioned in the Venona Cables) rather than in the text itself. Simply being mentioned one time in the cables does not confer notability, especially when there's basically zero coverage in any other RS that I can find. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 05:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches on News, Newspapers, Books, Scholars, Highbeam and JSTOR reveal nothing to show notability for this individual. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as my searches found nothing either and there's hardly much for a separate article. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.