Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statuska

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Statuska

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small company that does not yet meet WP:GNG. Current sourcing is churnalism and the section on the wearable device reads like an advert. (well actually the rest of the article also reads like an advert though perhaps not as strikingly) Pichpich (talk) 21:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Websites, and Israel. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing but press releases to be found. Amusingly, the article itself explains why: it's tiny for a social media platform, having only thousands of users. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines, this article lacks sources to demonstrate the subject's notability.Dejaqo (talk) 21:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources provided are PR type and from reliable. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 21:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. No objection to draftifying, would there be such a request. gidonb (talk) 16:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.