Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoonboy
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Spoonboy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete - Does not meet requirement for notability, seems like vanity ElAnimalSalvaje (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - in no way establishes notability, google search turns up myspace page etc with no reliable third-party sources. I would also question whether the band The Max Levine Ensemble itself is notable. Reichsfürst (talk) 22:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot drop me a line 17:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The band The Max Levine Ensemble appears to be legitimate and meets notability requirements. Keep under the condition of finding more accurate and reliable references. --Orman.michael (talk) 02:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to The Max Levine Ensemble. I can find no coverage about David Combs, aka Spoonboy, that establishes notability for him as an individual performer. -- Whpq (talk) 15:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agreed. I would delete this page, then have a discussion about The Max Levine Ensemble to see if we should keep that article or not. A redirect would work for the moment, but I remain unconvinced the other article should be kept either. 68.55.42.121 (talk) 21:48, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this and The Max Levine Ensemble, both seem like basically advertising their bands, rather than a reflection of what notable sources say about them. 173.66.159.138 (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.