Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speedy Graphito
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 05:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Graphito (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:37, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lack of notability or importance. Qwerty Binary (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Gallery representation seems substantial even if limited to just the one gallery I can find just now. I'd be tempted to "Keep" the article. Also a source called "PR Newswire" lists Speedy Graphito among "Five of the Best Urban Artists for 2012". Bus stop (talk) 18:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per lack of WP:BEFORE. Article already lists two reliable sources, the relevant article on French Wikipedia reveals a quite rich bibliography about this artist, a minimal search on Google news Archives shows 138 news articles about him including Nord Éclair, Le Parisien, Froggy Delight, The Times of India, Nord Éclair again, Le Point, Libération, Paris-Art. Notable. Cavarrone (talk) 06:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per the sources presented by User:Cavarrone. Upon review, most if not all of these are reliable sources about this person, who therefore passes WP:BASIC. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per Cavarrone. — ΛΧΣ21™ 01:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.