Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatial Words
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Spatial Words (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article makes no sense, even after copyediting. What are spatial words? Lfstevens (talk) 19:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No sources and can't find any sources that say what "spatial words" are. Probably doesn't pass GNG anyway. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Random assortment of concepts that are only vaguely connected, except in the original writer's mind. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. This seems to fail WP:IINFO as a random collection of unrelated topics. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.