Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound of Boston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sound of Boston

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local music blog that fails WP:ORG. Of the 11 sources in the article, only one (a college newspaper) is even a non-trivial mention by a third-party source. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:40, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, sources fail WP:GNG:

Sources #1, #3, #14, #17, #19 are part of the subject's website(s). FAIL.

Sources #2, #7, #8, #10, #13 only give trivial mentions. FAIL.

Sources #4, #5 appear to be the newspapers of the college of the founders of Sound of Boston, not independent. BORDERLINE.

Sources #6 is not reliable, probably is non-informational poll. FAIL.

Sources #11, #15 are promotional material. FAIL.

Source #16 seems to be routine and trivial coverage promoting an event. FAIL.

Source #18 is the subject's YouTube channel. FAIL.

I don't know about #9 because a subscriber paywall popped up, but it appears to be similar to #8. Does not pass GNG or ORG. UnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 03:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.