Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Document
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sound Document (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 02:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Label has You Say Party! We Say Die! but no independent sources for a V, NPOV, NOR article on the label itself. DoubleBlue (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. -- DoubleBlue (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What has happened that record labels of notable bands are suddenly deletable? The precedents, from what I recall, have reached a consensus that if there are multiple sources about the bands themselves (which mention that the bands are on that label) then that is sufficient for our notability guidelines. In this case, You Say Party! We Say Die! and Cadeaux are both notable (even though no one has yet written the article about Cadeaux). Anyway, I have added a few sources that mention the record label and verify that Dani Vachon is the owner. I would recommend keep. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There may have been a concensus formed, but it still fails WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I believe Paul Erik said it best. Hooper (talk) 07:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It meets WP:PEOPLE. We could rewrite it and move it to the page about the owner, but the result is pretty much the same. - Mgm|(talk) 13:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How does it meet WP:PEOPLE? The three "sources" are barely passing mentions. We have no sources or hope for any with which to create a WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR article. DoubleBlue (talk) 00:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not meet WP:CORP or even the brief note about labels in WP:MUSIC, viz: "...one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).". PKT(alk) 00:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: insufficient 3rd party notability WP:CORP. JamesBurns (talk) 06:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.