Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somift Data Organizer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Somift Data Organizer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The creator contested the prod. I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Question What is the direct reason of nominating this article for removal. Can someone please help me to understand what I did wrong with the article? Thank you Wxdeveloper (talk) 08:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The reason that was given by Joe Chill in the original PROD (proposed deletion) request that you deleted: "I can't find significant coverage for this software." Wikipedia requires articles to be about notable topics, where the meaning of "notable" on Wikipedia is involved. There are general notability rules and then there are rules that specifically cover software. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That software one isn't actually current policy. --Cybercobra (talk) 05:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The reason that was given by Joe Chill in the original PROD (proposed deletion) request that you deleted: "I can't find significant coverage for this software." Wikipedia requires articles to be about notable topics, where the meaning of "notable" on Wikipedia is involved. There are general notability rules and then there are rules that specifically cover software. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No coverage in reliable sources --Cybercobra (talk) 05:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The provided single reference doesn't support notabiliy Rirunmot (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability, borderline spam. RayTalk 18:50, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.