Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somdutta Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:53, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Somdutta Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. As of now its WP:PROMO and WP:TOOSOON. Calling for an AfD Discussion. Hatchens (talk) 07:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 07:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 07:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 07:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been removed from the list of People-related deletion discussions (already included in more specific deletion sorting categories). 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 03:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clear promotional article, this can go to LinkedIn Shadow4dark (talk) 07:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Spiderone 09:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Except the first reference from economic times, none of the other sources are reliable and significant, hence fails to meet WP:GNG -- Ab207 (talk) 19:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.