Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software trustworthiness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Software trustworthiness

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An editor mentioned on the talk page that this is no different than the article Fault tolerance. I also wouldn't recommend a redirect because I doubt many people would search for such a term on Wikipedia. SL93 (talk) 21:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in its present state, but with no prejudice against re-creation with proper sources. My impression is that this was originally created as a way to spam some references (to papers published in unreliable predatory journals) into Wikipedia. I removed those references as unreliable three years ago, and that has left the article unreferenced and neglected since then. But a Google scholar search for "software trustworthiness" finds many acceptable-looking sources and over 1500 hits, starting with "A survey on open source software trustworthiness" in IEEE Software 2011. If someone wants to take the effort to rewrite the article based on these sources, in a way that also distinguishes this concept from fault tolerance, I would have no objection. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is no information on the page. No references, no notability. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Footlessmouse (talk) 23:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.