Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snicki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 10:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snicki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No sources verifying anything on this page found on Google search. Without any further context, article violates WP:NOTDICDEF. Possible vio of WP:ONEDAY. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete again raises the question of why wp:oneday and wp:neologisms are not valid speedy criteria Porturology (talk) 08:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as another neologism per Porturology. --Oscarthecat (talk) 08:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO, no independent evidence of notability. WWGB (talk) 09:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Strikeout in OP made in light of further edits made to article; nevertheless, still a vio of WP:NEO as pointed out above by deletion proponents. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 09:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.