Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smartlist (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:11, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Smartlist

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither the cited sources nor anything elsewhere comes near to showing that this subject satisfies the notability guidelines. (Historical note: The article was subject to an AfD back in 2010, where there was very little participation. The closing administrator deleted the article, but because of the low particiapation restored it on request from the author of the article, but stated that "it remains subject to renomination if not improved". There has been little change to the article in the subsequent 8 years, and certainly none that indicates notability.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no claim of notability, and no secondary sources about this software. I don't see this as prominent enough (compared to a generic concept of smart lists) to justify a redirect to procmail. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.