Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart Card Web Server (SCWS)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close this discussion. Text merged to smart card with author's agreement. Redirect left at Smart Card Web Server. This title deleted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smart Card Web Server (SCWS)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zad68 (talk) 22:33, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Not enough content for separate article, merge into Smart card. Unsourced, and why is a specific port given? Can't the web server be configured on a variety of ports? Is there a particular requirements specification? Zad68 (talk) 22:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close - The nominator has requested a merge which does not require any discussion at Articles for Deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 16:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As I get it, his idea was the content can't be merged to SmartCard. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes you are right, it was silly of me to AfD when I should have just merged. I don't know why I did this, I should have known better. I'll do the merge when I can concentrate on that. Zad68 (talk) 20:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: such contect should generally be merged into wider topic (Smart card in this case), and I would suggest such merge if the discussed article had a single verified statement. We just can't merge the content that is not supported by sources. I dumped this article's content at Talk:Smart card/Archives/2014#Smart Card Web Server (SCWS) though. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I can find a reference for the one sentence that should be merged back. SCWS is a real thing, though. Zad68 (talk) 20:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Real or not, you can't merge two unsourced sentences. What you can is to write a sourced section in the target article, and as long as the source of the content is not the same, you just can't call this process "merger". That's why I recommend deletion. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - OK I get it, a merge is a Wikipedia technical definition that involves copying content verbatim, and that is not what I planned to do in this case. I had been calling it a merge because I intended to functionally put into the main Smart Card article the info that is here, although in my own words and sourced. Also, I wanted to rename the article title to Smart Card Web Server (without the acronym) and use that title as a redirect. Jeez I'm spending so much time typing it here that I could have just done it by now... Zad68 (talk) 01:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record: I object closing this AfD with keep result as SCWS is a clear subtopic of Smart Card topic. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Update I have added the appropriate, sourced paragraph of content at Smart_card#Smart_Card_Web_Server, moved Smart Card Web Server (SCWS) to Smart Card Web Server, and CSD'd Smart Card Web Server (SCWS). A non-involved non-admin (not me) can now non-admin close this AfD. Zad68 (talk) 15:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.