Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartBidNet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SmartBidNet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software, tagged under advert concerns since 2010 and as an orphan article since September. Cloudbound (talk) 19:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches simply found nothing better than a few links here and there at Books, News and browsers and nothing to suggest a better article here. SwisterTwister talk 21:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per CLoudbound Fails WP:SIGCOV and is Promotional a non notable software by JBKnowledge Technologies .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't seem to have significant coverage, most are press releases. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT (essay)—UY Scuti ^Talk 08:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Where to begin. Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:NSOFT. Also would qualify for deletion under WP:DEL4. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.