Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small Pieces Loosely Joined
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to David Weinberger. Daniel (talk) 01:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Small Pieces Loosely Joined (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage indicating specific notability. Could just be a mention in David Weinberger's article. ZimZalaBim talk 20:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Internet. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep or merge - This book seems to meet WP:NBOOK per these two reviews I found on Google Scholar 1 (PDF) 2. Also, the phrase "Small pieces loosely joined" seems to have quite a bit of currency even within the citing articles [1]. Psychastes (talk) 07:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Merge is fine. There's room in David Weinberger for it, and if anyone wants to expand it they can spin it back out. -- asilvering (talk) 03:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.