Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slomin's
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Slomin's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable security company. Article reads like an advert. Has been deleted twice previously. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC) World's Lamest Critic (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per PROMO and NCORP. DrStrauss talk 16:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I am the author of the article, and I say delete it. I created this article so long ago, long before I knew how Wikipedia articles ought to be written and long before I was familiar with most Wikipedia guidelines. Michipedian (talk) 18:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete When even the article's creator wants to delete, that says something. The only ref worthy here is #6, so GNG failure as well. South Nashua (talk) 15:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.