Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyscraperman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dan Goodwin. Consensus is we don't need a standalone article. Author has an article, so this could be a viable redirect. No merging as there are no reliable sources. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skyscraperman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seems to be no evidence that this is a notable book. I can't find any reviews, and it is pretty obvious that the article is partly a marketing effort. Drmies (talk) 03:05, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:38, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I also could find no reviews or any indication that there has been any arm's-length third-party source of expert opinion. To the best of my knowledge, this book was self-published and thus attracts no inherent notability. Ubelowme _U ^Me 14:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking independent coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merging and redirect to Dan Goodwin. Per common sense, I'd say. Cavarrone (talk) 09:13, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.