Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sippai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn (keep). - Mailer Diablo 02:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sippai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The film has reportedly been shelved. Cast and crew has not worked on this project for almost a year. It's unlikely to be continued or to be released. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: Saravanan, Sippai Gautham Karthik, Sippai

Keep per meeting WP:NFF (paragraph 3) for a slow-moving project which has begun filming and is not yet released.[1] Even were this to be never released, we'd have coverage to show its failure as meeting inclusion criteria. Or perhaps the topic can be spoken of in the director's article? IF there ever is one. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 19:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, not much has changed on that site since 2013 and I've heard from insider circles that the crew is unlikely to continue this project. Btw, it was also me who created this article and I nominated it straightaway for deletion since I wasn't sure if it's notable enough to be kept as an unreleased film. If it meets the criteria, I'll withdraw the nomination and re-edit the article. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution. Well, as WP:NFF instructs that failures can even meet inclusion criteria, the information on its filming and (failed) completion certainly has enough sourcability to be spoken of within the filmmaker's article. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 16:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 00:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.