Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Bray
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 22:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Simon Bray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't meet biography notability. By the note here User_talk:DoctorHugh0 and the history it appears that he recreated this article the day he was notified of it's deletion. Habanero-tan (talk) 15:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only reference is his own website! It does not meet the guide lines in anyway. Artypants, Babble 17:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for now. Add a {{unreferenced}}, wait a month and see what happens. The article claims notability but simply doesn't provide reliable sources under WP:RS. The creators/editors may have them but just need a week or two to post them.OlYellerTalktome 12:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - 0 relevant Google News ghits. All awards (even if substantiated) aren't equal. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.