Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikuli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sikuli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 06:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Delete: no significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 06:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS coverage. Refs provided are PR and developers' sites. A search turned up blog entries but not significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 12:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.