Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidharth Prabhu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Normally I would relist this again, but in light of the long period without transclusion and lack of participation for 21 days I am going to close it as a no consensus due to lack of interest. Any user may relist this without prejudice as a fresh debate. KaisaL (talk) 00:07, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sidharth Prabhu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

URLs used for References are bare URLs and there's no importance of the article. The Page creator is creating pages by submitting invalid URLs to confuse the Wikipedia. So I'm requesting to delete these kind of pages from Wikipedia. Josu4u (talk) 14:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Unsure about notability, but the refs are about films in which he appeared. If they discuss the actor in a substantial way, they are relevant. DGG ( talk ) 17:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DGG, Those are not films and all the refs didn't even mentioning anything about the Sidharth Prabhu, hope its a hoax.Josu4u (talk) 20:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

there has certainly been a great deal of junk in this general topic area recently. We in the US have a great difficulty in judging, because there is the impression that a great many newspaper articles in India about films and performers and allied media are paid for. Ref 6 seems to be about a movie, but is the site any better than IMdB? And he isn't mentioned on it in any case. DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No DGG, its not better than IMDb. That website is only adding articles about films in India, sometimes these websites publish paid articles for the promotion of films. Here in India too we consider IMDb as genuine. Josu4u (talk) 22:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Note: This discussion was not properly transcluded until now, please consider that when deciding on closing. I have also added the above AfD template. Monty ₈₄₅ 23:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The given references are about productions in which the subject has appeared, not about the subject himself, except The Hindu article from 2012 where a passing comment said just "Siddharth and Bhagyalakshmy are cast as their kids.". That is a long way from anything that could demonstrate biographical notability, nor are my searches finding anything better. At best WP:TOOSOON. AllyD (talk) 07:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.