Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharvari Wagh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 23:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sharvari Wagh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failing the notability criteria. Self promotion coverage on reliable sources. PangolinPedia (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. PangolinPedia (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. PangolinPedia (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is a bit soon, but searching news turns up LOTS of references. It looks like she already qualifies by WP:GNG, though I haven't checked the sources in depth, and there will be more coverage on an ongoing basis. The last headline mention in a legimiate news source was 11 hours ago[1]. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 00:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as now it has more sources. There would be more coverage when film will release -- Parnaval (talk) 03:12, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.