Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaolan Hsueh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article's subject is found to be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shaolan Hsueh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Prodded (and prod endorsed), can't think of anything to add to Prod rationale so here it is again) Non-notable; doesn't come close to satisfying any of the criteria for WP:NAUTHOR. Anyone can write a book, anyone can give a 15 minute talk for TED, anyone can run a Kickstarter. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 02:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Unotable author. Wgolf (talk) 03:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Has some independent sources: [1][2][3][4]. Though one can also argue the notability is with the product and not the creator. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 11:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Conserve. Not everyone presented an official TED talk (not an independently-organised event) and (more importantly) not everyone wrote a book which receive extended media coverage and was translated in eleven languages within its first year. I created the article to talk about the book and the learning method but I thought the title should be the author. The method definitely deserved an encyclopaedic description in Wikipedia; but do not hesitate to add more sources (as I did today) and to suggest improvements or new title if you thinks it would be better. Han Pin Yu Tan (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep look at the 4 sources given above in a comment [5] is a reliable profile of her published not because she was already notable at that point, but just as a sort of human interest piece. still it's reliable. The next three are profiles in major international news outlets about her method of teaching Chinese, Fast Company, ], Voice of America. These are enough to justify an article. [6] [7][8] But in addition, the page itself has this [9] from The Guardian. So, yeah, successfully promoting yourself and the learning system you created/book you wrote into the Guardian and onto Voice of America equate to notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:14, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Passes WP:BASIC. Source examples: [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.