Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shailesh Pandey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shailesh Pandey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to support general notability guideline and no evidence of passing WP:NACTOR or WP:BIO. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not satisfying our basic notability standards for actors. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 18:38, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: I don't care what happens to this article, but why delete articles because some people recognize them as "not notable enough"? Even if they aren't that notable, isn't the point of Wikipedia to have articles on (almost) everything? You know what I mean. Just my opinion. 74.108.224.146 (talk) 21:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's not Wikipedia is for. You need to read WP:Notability and WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But the lack of 'online' source doesn't prove that the person is not 'notable enough' . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:A022:7CBC:0:0:1236:E8A0 (talk)

@2405:205:A022 Exactly. Though like I said, I don't care what happens to this page. 74.108.224.146 (talk) 01:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@74.108.224 146 , @2405.205.A022 a link has been added to the acticle as a source.

Helpforwikipedia ^{(Wanna discuss?)} 12:39, 29 July 2017 (IST)

why not remove the tag then ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:C000:28BB:0:0:1CCB:10A4 (talk) 08:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT Delete: Although i agree with Clarityfiend but i don't think this page should be deleted.This person has notable contribution in the development of Bhojpuri cinema.I don't care whether its deleted or not but it should exist on wikipedia.

Helpforwikipedia ^{(Wanna discuss?)} 09:13, 27 July 2017 (IST) — Helpforwikipedia (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

~~Keep~~:Is the discussion dead ?

If no one is in favour of the Nomination of deletion,why not keep it.I know the online sources in the favour of this article is less but this person exists indeed,and is has appeared in regional newspapers and tv interviews (I'm from the same state) . Helpforwikipedia ^{(Wanna discuss?)} 09:13, 27 July 2017 (IST) — Helpforwikipedia (talk • contribs)

I have struck your !vote since you can only !vote once in each AfD, and this was the second time for you. Your reasons for keeping an article above are not valid. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a social networking site or a vehicle for advertising and promotion please see What Wikipedia is not. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The article Shailesh Pandey was earlier created by Helpforwikipedia in November 2016 and he also created Shailesh pandey. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:06, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:PROMO. DrStrauss talk please use {{ping|DrStrauss}} when replying 09:05, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He exists, but my searches found no sources indicating that he is notable. E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm in agreement - there are a few minor roles suggested on IMDB, but no coverage that suggests he passes WP:GNG notability. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.